I’m getting a sense of what our demographic/target readers want.
Some very respectable commentators a few days ago praised the content that MYSAS offered as being wholesome ( I paraphrase here) to begin with, because the language and tone of the blog was moderate and could therefore be offered to liberals to view without offending their sensibilities.
I understand this. Make the message factual, sensible, unemotional if possible, and above all don’t bring race into the discussion. Avoid all perjorative racial slights if we want to get credibility and keep credibility.
The sad thing that I’ve come to realize is that this blog cannot accomodate two catagories of readers. The second catagory of readers are ordinary white people who probably grew up in the 70’s and 80’s (if my own experience is a yardstick) and remember the way things used to be. People weren’t fearful going about their business, they trusted the police, the roads were clean and people could find work. What’s wrong with that?
Well, since handing over the keys to the estate in ‘94 we’ve noticed how the country has fallen to ruin and is continuing to do so.
I suggest that if you are reading this and haven’t been abroad, or haven’t been to a first world country you try and make a trip to see how things ought to be. This is what we want for South Africa.
Throughout the blogosphere is the lash called “racist.” Most people who use this term don’t understand what it means. I am a racist because I understand that there are differences between the races; it’s plain to see. I cannot pretend that we are all equal because you know it and I know it – we are not. Simply put, the term racist cannot be derogatory. In its scientific definition it indicates an understanding that there are distinct differences between the races. I am a scientist and an evolutionist.
To get to the point, we gave the South African blacks democracy. It is a white man’s idea. No sooner had we offered this to the blacks then they demonstrated their racism by first voting on tribal lines, secondly on racial (black) lines and then a distant third would be an understanding of the issues at the voting station. I very much doubt whether 99% of all blacks in Africa understand issues when voting. Honestly now, do you ever think that there will be a white president in South Africa ever again? No, no matter if he were the most qualified politician in the whole world. His white skin would disqualify him.
I am an expat. But I have a dog in this fight, I have skin in the game. My relatives are still in South Africa because they want to be there but are subjugated by the black horde.
I recognize the black for what he is: a childlike, violent predator in a grown man’s body who desires public office so that he can at first opportunity loot government coffers to enrich himself. He cares not for the whites who handed him a first world country on a plate and certainly cares not for how he is destroying the economy and murdering the populace.
I recognize this black as a subspecies of the human race – a suboid of sorts that is eons behind Europeans in evolution; but we have told him that he is exactly the same as us.
No he is not. Not in my book and probably not as far as most of you are concerned. So you are the people we shall write for. Perjorative terms for the hapless, slothful, dishonest, hostile and dangerous black will follow. Political correctness has no place here. Our opinion and articles are intended to reveal the destruction of the country and its people as it happens.
I do not want to lose any readers, but we cannot satisfy both of you. For the liberal minded folk who drop in to see what’s new, I extend a warm hand of friendship and I hope we hear from you from time to time. I don’t go out of my way to offend any white person.
We must tell the truth as we see it and preserve a land for white people to live in and raise their families without fear.
-Gonville
ALL RACES ARE NOT THE SAME!
How is it possible that black African countries with extremely fertile soil and generous precipitation cannot feed their own people?
Why are these blacks always dependent on white countries to feed them? And this was the case since we first met them in the 1600’s! Nothing to do with earth warming, racism, colonialism, apartheid or anything that whites did…!
Why are these black countries in central Africa not the farming Mecca of the world?
Why are they not the breadbasket for arid North African countries and semi-arid South Africa?
Why is it that the semi-arid South Africa could feed its own people and export food to Africa and the rest of the world during Apartheid or white rule?
Why was Rhodesia under white rule able to feed its own and export food to the rest of Africa and the world?
How stupid must one really be not to see the fine “white” line running through every success story in history? Or to see the black line running through every disastrous country or state?
How long will it take and how many whites in Africa will be offered to the false black god of falsely perceived race equality, worshipped by the brainwashed white West and their evil white leaders who in turn are lead by the wicked money masters of this world?
STOP THE WHITE GENOCIDE IN AFRICA!
WAKE UP WHITES, YOU ARE UNDER SIEGE!
The liberals opened a new begging bowl for Africa.
This time the blacks are however not begging, they are demanding that whites must feed and fund their useless, corrupt, cruel, savage and primitive black peoples and countries. This whilst they are slowly but surely invading the West, corrupting it from inside!
The new black begging bowl is called Earth Warming. Before it was human rights and before that it was “all men are created equal” etc…
This time the liberals or as these white idiots now refer to them selves as “progressives”, have invented a way in which they can empower blacks not to beg, but to demand that whites must work, be productive, pay outrages taxes and support all useless blacks.
Watch out whites!
Your leaders tested this plan on white South Africa and we are working, paying taxes, funding these savages’ every wish and foolish extravagance… and we are still being persecuted with a hidden white genocide…
As your leaders sold out white South Africa, they are now doing to you. And they will proceed slowly, you will get used to being shafted up the stinker, the “moderates” amongst you will betray any and all efforts by the realists amongst you, to save yourselves from this evil future.
Wake up, identify your enemies on all levels and act!
If you don’t, you will have to embrace a future where your wives, daughters and loved ones are raped, tortured for fun, robbed and murdered, where you live in housing resembling self built jails, where unarmed movement outside will be a death defying act and where talking, discussing or revealing the truth will be seen as treason and your once loving state and government will persecute you, re-educate you into being a willing victim, or jail and torture you, or kill you. That is if your new black equals do not torture and kill you first.
If you want a proper understanding of the evolution of those that left Africa some time in the last 100000 years you should read There is a new book out ‘The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution’ by Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending. They explain how we have been evolving apart and why we are different.
Well said !!
I agree 100%. I grew up in the 70’s / 80’s and remember what is was like. Even under sanctions, we lived in a 1st class society. Our police were highly regarded public servants, as were most of our civil servants. Sure you got some greedy stupid whites that enriched themselves in their positions, but by and large everything worked and people trusted the police and their neighbours. Now, it is a shit hole full or murdering, thieving blacks running around. I left South Africa and know, deep down, that is is gone forever. It will never be the way it was and has only one destiny… to be a truly african country, like all the rest. Thanks for the website guys and for keeping thr truth coming.
Oh, and just for those that doubt that the blacks and whites are not the same, please spend a few hours to enlighten yourself and learn the truth about the different species of human being that live on earth. Whites and blacks are not the same and should be re-classified accordingly…
http://www.erectuswalksamongst.us/
if i may, can i recommend to the owners / moderators / groot baas of this website to please add a category or section for recommended reading. It would be good to have a place to view a list of recommended books / e-books that people can read and maybe even comment on. Would be a nice feature and the book linked above can be the first in the list. The book linked above made everything clear for me.
Please dont swear while you’re being killed.
“How is it possible that black African countries with extremely fertile soil and generous precipitation cannot feed their own people?”
That’s because they are hunter/gatherers and not farmers. Like wild animals they are scavengers and when there is nothing to scavenge they starve.
@ E=hf says:
November 18, 2009 at 6:51 pm
You are correct. They were hunter-gatherers.
But if the theory of evolution had any value, should they not have adapted and evolved to savages that support sustainable development? Sustain themselves by repeat food and income derived from farming?
What on earth could be the reason for these savages’ inability to produce that which they begged for from whites in the past and now demand to be provided with?
Could it be insufficient IQ, aptitude and ethics?
With these crucial short comings, should the liberals not adhere to their own believe in natural selection and let this useless species die out?
Instead they became murderer-robbers/beggars.
Definitely not a sustainable source for survival.
But a direct threat for those forced to sustain them!
The answer to this dilemma can be found in the very first book of our Holy Bibles. There were two separate creation events, separated by many years. If you grasp this concept it becomes clear why the black man’s attempts to farm on a large scale have always failed.
Man Created… Hunter-gatherers
(Geneses 1: 27-28) – “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; MALE AND FEMALE CREATED HE THEM. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, …” (and they sure did!)
Adam formed… White Man – (First Farmer)
(Genesis 2: 5) – “And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and THERE WAS NOT A MAN TO TILL THE GROUND.”
The most remarkable evidence that Genesis Chapter 1 and Genesis Chapter 2 are not speaking of the same event would be:
In Genesis 1, the plants and animals were created BEFORE man(kind) was created. The animals were WILD ANIMALS (beasts of the earth) and the plants were WILD PLANTS. No names were given.
In Genesis 2, the plants and animals were formed AFTER the man Adam was formed. They were DOMESTIC ANIMALS (beasts of the field) and CROP PLANTS, which Adam later named.
Anyone who wishes to explore the possibility, from a non-biblical point of view, that there were two separate creation events on this earth, need only research the origins of domestic “farm” animals. You will quickly discover that, besides cattle which were created in the 1st event, all the other so-called domestic (farm) animals, such as the horse, sheep, goat, etc.. did not have their origins in Africa, but mainly in Eurasia – The Cradle of the White Race.
This theory also implies that the black races were here first, which can explain why the Khoisan are regarded in scientific – genetic circles as the oldest race on earth, — and also why we are NOT the same!
More Info >> http://tia-mysoa.blogspot.com/2009/11/adam-farmer.html
I don’t agree with you. When God created ” man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; MALE AND FEMALE CREATED HE THEM. And God blessed them, and God said unto them…” , He for sure didn’t create a black savage! That is not the image of my God!
Well Ant, fortunately I don’t believe in myth, superstition, fairies or Santa Claus, but in science – the same science that has developed and enabled technology for you to use your computer to post your opinion with.
May your god go with you.
@ Ant,
Tia’s insight above is quite near to how I see it.
As I see and understand it, when translated directly from the original bible scripts, the 6th day creation was done by God Elohim. Which means God and the angels. So they created beasts of the earth (wild animals) and humans Many of them) and many different races of people.
The puzzle I am still trying to solve is whether the black races were part of the beasts of the earth or whether they were part of the human races created… Perhaps an angel who were a slacker created them?!
Then at a later date perhaps 1000 years later, God YHWH Himself FORMED man (Adam the Caucasian), then crop plants, then domestic and farm animals (beasts of the field). Then Adam named all these formed objects.
Then God saw that Adam could not find himself a suitable mate or help amongst all that were already created, so God took Adam’s rib and created the woman Eve, a suitable and thus Caucasian wife for him.
Through the lineage of Adam and Eve came the Caucasian race or white race and they obviously then were the true Israelites of old.
Go through the trouble and study the site:
http://www.biblestudysite.com
Lots of reading, but when you have read it all, lots of today’s chaos will make more sense to you and everyone else who are willing to invest the time and grey matter.
Everyone will then also realize exactly how confused, mislead and evil supporting, the liberal whites are…
@ Vryburger
They did evolve. They evolved into parasites and just like a parasite they eventually kill the host on which they feed and then they ALL (will hopefully) die off.
@ E=hf
Whether evolved or devolved into parasites is of little importance. That they are parasites and that Caucasians are their main hosts is of cardinal importance.
Further more, it will be no consolation that the parasites will eventually die out after they caused the death of their hosts.
We must find and administer the correct plague control and inoculations to get rid of the parasites and to make our people immune against renewed onslaughts.
That will be the only way in which white man will survive this invasion of the unnamed, undeclared and deadly plague.
Personally I think its ok, and even necessary to refer to ‘blacks’ and whites. I also think it makes you more referencable if you avoid terms like ‘kaffir’, ‘boon’, ‘monkey’ etc in the main articles.
For example in this article you state that you think that blacks are a sub-species, predators etc. Anyone could quote you and link to your article becuae it sounds like a rational, intelligent argument. But if you had said ‘kaffirs’ are this or that then it just makes it more difficult to forward your articles around and it sounds childish.
PLEASE DON’T EVER REFER TO THEM AS AFRICANS!!!!- its a pet peeve of mine the way that its portrayed that only blacks are Africans and whites are not. imagine the uproar if only whites were British, or blacks could not be Europeans. I have made it a personal battle in my new country to always refer to myself as African (I have noted with joy that some forms do list ‘white African’ as an ethnicity choice). Anyone who their insists on reserving the word ‘African’ for blacks only is a racist regardless of how liberal they claim to be. I think that Mark Shuttleworth was a flippin genius when he went on his PR campaign and tours round schools in SA as ‘the first African in space’. Its probably the only time that Mandela ever referred to a white person as an African!
You’re right – Africans come in all shapes and sizes. Arabs to the north, whites to the south and blacks…everywhere. And of course the San.
what if we combine,kaffir,simian,baboon,sloth,shovel nose,apeshit,savage etc.into one word,lets say “beautiful people”,it will confuse the liberals but we will know the meaning.
What do you suggest B?
only whites were British
Correct.
blacks could not be Europeans
Indeed they can’t. A small number of blacks can assimilate, prosper, and basically be “Honorary Europeans”, but only a small number. Replace whites in Europe with blacks and the word European won’t mean the same thing, because blacks are different than whites.
If you asked a Japanese how long it will take for their Korean minority to be Japanese, they will look at you like you are retarded. Which of course you would be, in that special way that only white people can be.
Japanese and Koreans are a helluva lot closer to each other than blacks and white “Africans”, yet Japanese do not call their Koreans “Japanese.” That’s because the term is more than a mere geographic designation.
A person is not Japanese simply because they, their father, and their grandfather were born and raised in the island of Japan.
Japanese also distrust their ex-pats.
So what should one make of the claim of a white man that he is African? Does he mean, as one would commonsensically mean with regard to an immigrant to Europe, that he has absorbed and assimilated into a culture — French or Hungarian or German or something — that existed before his arrival and thereby prospered? No, because any prosperity the white man experiences in Africa is due to his presence, and if he assimilated into one of the pre-existing cultures there would BE no prosperity.
The only honest senses in which a white man can be called African — that is, simply living on the continent or having been shaped by the geography — have no equivalence to “Japanese” or “European”, and the assertion of such equivalence is either ignorant, disingenuous or both.
Remember that when the white people arrived in Southern Africa there was no culture that existed before his arrival. In fact there is very little archaeological records of a culture that existed in southern Africa before the arrival of the white man. History shows that the white Boer tribes moved into the area around the same time as the black tribes. (within a single generation). Therefore it may properly be said that the white man is an African as they created a unique culture on their arrival into Southern Africa. A culture that is unique to the area. The black people that moved into the area are the ones that assimilated in many ways to this white mans African culture. The whole concept of apartheid served to prevent the black man from assimilating into the white African culture.
It can therefore honestly be said that a white person can be called an African. As the original, dominant culture in Southern Africa the white African culture has a direct equivalence to the “Japanese” or “European”, and the assertion that there was already a dominant culture in place on their arrival is either ignorant, disingenuous or both.
Interesting how when African whites do something that brings prestige to black Africans, in front of the world, only THEN are they called “brother” and “African”. Otherwise they are usually referred to as “Colonialists” or “Invaders” etc.
To get to the point, we gave the South Africa blacks democracy. It is a white man’s idea.
Just about everywhere in Africa where blacks were given democracy, debacle has followed. You end up with either dictatorships, failed states, or just plain out insanity (think Idi Amin). Despite this historical record, Western liberals (and I use that term very broadly) have insisted that democracy can be made to work in the new South Africa. It’s the same old story: when ideology conflicts with reality, the ideologues choose the ideology over the reality.
The thing is, given mass third world migration into Europe and North America, there is no reason to believe that the same pattern will not emerge again in First World countries. As third worlders become a dominating force, they will bring their pathologies with them, which means an end to democracy as well as advanced societies. But liberals will rationalize this away in the interests of their ideology. We can already see this with the rise of multicultism, diversity indoctrination and hate crime law. Effectively, liberals have to create a virtual police state in order to make reality conform to ideology. But regardless of what happens, reality will triumph in the end. This means the destruction of the unique cultural-political traditions of the West, and with them, the proverbial Decline of the West.
This is why I see the South Africa as a harbinger for Western Civilization.
Anyway, thanks for confronting these issues openly.
I cannot disagree with any of the points you have made.
I also see it like this.
So with your thinking there!
But what will happen to our culture? The way “society” is going, It would seem as if a dumbed-down and half nigger average would be good way of living!? NWO goes hahaha. What will happen to our Art, Music, Creations etc? We invented all these things, and it is suddenly deemed ‘legal’ that it be taken away for the ’sins’ of our fathers?!
I cannot conceieve with my “Engineer’s Brain” this backward thing which has been labelled and accepted.
Compare, for example, your average 70’s music with this dumbed-dowm current music?!! WTF!!?
Having said that, there are redeeming qualities in this life!
EMALL!
I call it as I see it. Half devil, half child. Our retarded brother that we have to carry along in this world, to our detriment.
Excellent article!
NICE GUYS NEVER WIN.
Years ago in Africa I had a colleaque that was Northern Transvaal Heavy weight boxing champion for some years. Amongst others, one of his motto’s was “Nice guys never win” – of which he was for ever reminded by his former coach.
Often I have reminisced of how apt this motto applied to the legacy of the White man in South Africa. We were so nice to the kaffirs(bleks or bleksims for the O so moderates) – and we lost miserably.
We built schools by the thousands, universities, colleges, houses and hospitals for them, formulated and promoted their languages(I had to take Sepedi up to matric – all our text books written by White men), gave them vast stretches of real estate as “Homelands” and tried to train them unsuccessfully to run it themselves. When they proved to stupid to run those territories we became even nicer – we gave them the whole goddamned country to ruin. I recall the “Dept of Bantu Admin and Developement”(hell, how many Utopian dreamers did we have) – which spent hundreds of millions to establish black this and black that – all terminating in total loss and failure – we were so nice.
And with this vast legacy of being nice to the kaffir and what we got(and are getting) for it, the neurotic and pshycotic left and “moderates” still insist on being nice to the kaffir. (Do’nt use “harsh” language – you might upset some people).
We were nothing but nice sacrificial idiots.
We were so nice!
Nice guys never win!
Yup – you are 100% correct. No good deed goes unpunished is another moto to heed.
Most people (us) Whites do not and cannot see the difference. Just because the problem walks upright it has been awarded “Human Status”.
I am running out of answers here. Please UG, UC, DoDD, or even Laughmyarseoff or somebody point me in a direction where I can contribute to our survival. I am not by any stretch of the imagination a neo natzi. But, having said that, I hate liberals.
My time is (read: fuse) running out. The problem is really and truly a childlike emotional thing, and as cruel as the devil And there are so many of the things! Didn’t our forefathers have something to ‘fix’ locusts?
But, one more eloquent person than I am, posted here something about the ultimate african enslavery. The things have been re-entrapped in themselves.
To hell with the liberal minded among us who hate their own and would rather be surrounded by these bipedal abominations. Every where they go there is nothing but crime and filth. All these liberals talk a good game about equality this and equality that but they don’t abide by their own dogma. How many of these libs live in the ghettos of Los Angeles, Detroit or Chicago? How many live in the townships of SA? NONE OF THEM!!!
They know they wouldn’t last a second. But their “feelings” and ideology trump all. Do you think any of these white mult cultis would allow their precious daughters to walk alone in the projects or the ghettos? Of course not, but they still push this nonsense of “we are all equal and the same”.
I work in the entertainment industry and I am surrounded by liberal wack jobs. When they start their preaching I just simply tell them to send their daughters to the ghettos and to walk around and see how much their “brothers” really love those little white girls. They all shut up and whisper under their breaths about the racists among them.
We had 3 blacks who were working for us. One of them was a hard worker who showed up every day to work and did his job. The other two were fired after awhile…one for not showing up to work and making up expense reports for reimbursement and the other for constantly screwing up and showing up to work drunk and being belligerent. I then had to listen to the retard libs talk about how they felt bad about the situation and that it was the companies fault for not making the blacks feel welcome.
Let me tell you what changes the mind of MOST libs about their silly ideology…once they become the victim of violent crime by one of these bipedal abominations. That’s when the rose colored lenses are lifted and they see the world for the way it really is. I should know…it happened to me. I was once one of these white males that held liberal views on race. After getting mugged and a bottle broken over my head with threats of “I’m going to kill you white boy!!!” everything changed. I could see the hate in this black man’s eyes for no reason than the color of my skin. I could see his glee as he danced around me and kicked me while I was on the ground.
I will never be a victim again. I train at the range once a month and have perfected the mozambique drill. Whoa to anyone of these bipedal abominations that EVER approaches me again late at night and threatens me.
To make a difference you have to stand up. Good for you!
Way to go my brother. I must tell you a story of what happened to me back in the old days.
I was in the army in Pretoria ( I was about 18 at the time) and had the weekend off. I had a girlfriend who lived in Joburg and I was on my way to visit her when I heard screams behind me. I turned around to see a kaffir struggling with a white woman over her handbag. He managed to rip it from her grasp, and whilst still looking over his shoulder at his victim, he legged it, straight towards where I was standing. As he came past me, I stuck out my leg and tripped him and before he was able to recover, I proceeded to kick the shit out of the stupid nigger. When I was finished I picked up the ladies bag and was about to hand it back to her, when she started shouting at me for beating up the kaffir.
“How dare you beat that poor man up like that” she screamed at me. “He might have stolen my bag but he didn´t deserve to be beaten half to death by you. You should be ashamed of yourself”, she said as she reach out to reclaim possession of her bag.
I withdrew my arm with the bag still firmly clenched in my hand, helped the black bastard to his feet, and handed him the bag. He didn´t need a second invitation and made a bolt for it before I changed my mind.
Fucking liberals. They just don´t know when to shut the fuck up.
Ditsem! LOL!
Vryburger says:
“Why was Rhodesia under white rule able to feed its own and export food to the rest of Africa and the world?” – Amen. There weren’t that many Rhodesians, either. I’m so incredibly sick of the endless excuses……legacy of slavery……legacy of colonialism……legacy of apartheid. NO, it’s the legacy of incompetence! How much evidence do people require until they are able to firmly remove their heads from their arses? I abhor the thought of violence and war as much as the next civilized man, but come on – people have got to wake up, and soon. This kind of crap is exactly what is coming to the US now. We will live in a society consisting of various squabbling ethnic groups all jockeying for power. These ethnic groups will stand in defense of their own, but the European peoples are at present denied the right to voice concerns for the future of their children and their society. If you don’t have a spine, you cannot take a stand. I’m afraid the US is increasingly being populated by effeminate sensitive men who are essentially good for very little. We have been becoming a nation of talkers and runners, not fighters. I suppose we will reep what we sow.
Baie treurig
“…it’s the legacy of incompetence!” How true that is.
“…effeminate sensitive men…” – we’re becoming a gender (whites anyway) of apologetic metrosexuals.
I like your post.
With you all the way, Gonville!
Fully support you on this. Keep up the good work!