To Be or not to Be

March 11th, 2010

Compare and contrast - Jews and Afrikaners

Here is a provocative piece sent in by Mike Smith from WSAS fame. It’s good to hear from Mike and to read his insight into South African affairs.

-Gonville

By Mike Smith

11 March 2010

The moment you put the revolver against your head, the moment before you pull the trigger you are confronted with the question from Shakespeare in Hamlet…To be, or not to be…

It is a conscious decision. You hold the answer to it. The decision is solely yours.

When attacked by those who want to take your life, The life of your wife and the lives of your children… again you are confronted with that age old question, “To be or not to be…”

In our daily lives at work, in the confrontations of life in general, we are constantly faced with the decision, “To be, or not to be”…Every time it is a conscious decision.

On 17 March 1992 the whites in South Africa were faced with this question too. Nobody put the gun against their heads. Nobody decided for them. The Whites of South Africa voted in a referendum to hand power over to the Marxist Blacks and thereby chose “Not to be”.
Since then, more than 3100 white farmers have been killed by black gangs ordained by the Marxist ANC scum fuelled on by the words of their leaders such as Peter Mokaba, “Kill the Boer, Kill the farmer”.

Thousands more Whites were killed in their homes in white areas, More than a million Whites have emigrated since 1994, i.e. 25% of all white South Africans.

The ones who emigrated were also faced with this question, “To be, or not to be”. They chose “To be”…and moved on to greener pastures.
The ones who are left behind in South Africa are faced with this question on a daily basis. They wanted“To be”, but their enemies won’t allow them “To be”.

Today the whites in South Africa have to decide whether it is “nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and, by opposing, end them” as Shakespeare mentions. In other words, they can choose, “to be” or not to be.

Or they can choose to sleep, to turn a blind eye to what is happening in South Africa. They can choose , “To die, to sleep no more – and by a sleep to say we end the heartache and the thousand natural shocks.”….

It is only a decision, my friends…

Nobody can take that decision for you. It is a conscious decision you have to take yourselves. It is a conscious decision every white South African will have to take in his heart, “To be or not to be”.

The question is knocking at the heart of every white South African today. Will their choice be, “To die, to sleep. To sleep, perchance to dream.”???
“For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, Th’ oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns… That patient merit of th’ unworthy takes…”

The unworthy ? If one chooses “”Not to be” I would like to call them the “unworthy”. If the Whites of South Africa chooses “Not to be” then they are unworthy to take ownership of a country their forefathers fought for and died for.

History is full of civilisations, Great civilisations who have somewhere along the line been confronted with the question, “To be, or not to be” and they have chosen “Not to be”. The Egyptians, the Greeks, The Romans, have all disappeared. Their cultures, their languages, their religions are all gone today. The Vikings, the Germanic tribes, The Incas, the Mayas have all chosen at some stage, “Not to be” and so their religions, and cultures have disappeared.

But is there a culture, a people a religion that we can learn from? Certainly there is. The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche says it best.

“The Jews are the most remarkable nation of world history because, faced with the question of being or not being, they preferred … being at any price…”

Love them or hate them, but you will respect them. The Jews have chosen “To Be”. The Greeks and the Roman civilisations with all their gods are gone today, but the Jews are still with us. Civilisations who have lasted hundreds, even of thousands of years have disappeared, but the Jews prevail, because they have chosen “To be”….at any price.

Now I can quote reams of clichés about nice guys finishing last. I will never claim that Jews are innocent. Who is? Christianity has wiped out entire civilisations in South America. Islam, the Mongols, etc have probably been worse. The Jews are no exception. They have their fair share of evils documented in the Bible, destroying their enemies letting no building standing and killing every man, woman, child and animal.
But that is what it means, “To be, at any price”.

So what if the Jews control the banking, the major media, or whether they see the gentiles as Goyim? Human cattle? The Jews have taken a stance. They want “To be””. They want to be here tomorrow and they want to be here in a thousand years. Whatever it takes. Whatever it takes means exactly that. Controlling both normal Hollywood as well as the pornography of Ron Jeremy and Heidi Fleisch.  It does not matter if one is Liberal or Conservative. It does not matter if one is a legitimate businessman such as Sol Kerzner or Raymond Ackerman or whether one is a gangster such as Mayer Lansky.It does not matter if one is an actress such as Sarah Jesica Parker or an award winning director such as Steven Spielberg. In the back of the mind of every Jew, they have taken the decision “to be”.

Persecuted for more than 4000 years, the Jews are still here
In the bigger scope of things, what is the Whites of Africa? What is 350 years in South Africa? The whites who came to Africa, built a country complete with infrastructure, dams, airports, roads, harbours, schools, universities, etc The whites who came to South Africa, built a civilisation to be here for a thousand years.

Twenty years ago they decided to give it all away. Twenty years ago the whites decided “Not to be”. Well I am afraid that when a people decide to “Not be” then they did not deserve such a beautiful country in the first place.

But Arthur Schopenhauer gives us hope, for he says, “There is something in us, however, which tells us that this is not so, that this is not the end of things, that death is not an absolute annihilation.”

Yes, there is hope. We just have to take a conscious decision, “To be, at any price”.

the Holy Grail of Kaffir Entitlement – a reply

March 10th, 2010

This is a follow-up comment to ‘the Holy Grail of Kaffir Entitlement’.

Don’t know if this is a black diamond but certainly over promoted. some time after 1994 we citizens used to do street patrols at night to secure our suburb. My one partner was a manager for a firm that drives around mobile money vans in order to pay out social welfare funds.

He told many fascinating stories during patrol, one of which was a visit to a certain welfare government Department. They had to negotiate a tender with a black Deputy Director. On meeting this man in his office, they found him eating porridge with his fingers, like he used to do in the kraal (google ‘kraal’ – a black encampment with cattle and straw huts).

A senior white man at one of the large South African Life Assurance firms, whom I met on friendly terms for he also was in the army years ago, and now busy with his doctorate, told me there was this black senior manager who joined the company a year ago.

A year later this black executive decided to leave for a higher salary, for educated blacks are scarce as fingernails and for BEE (quota system) purposes highly in demand, so they just job-hop like they want to. He doubled his pay, and when asked why he is leaving, he said his new firm can buy him a better car and doubles his salary. This white man, also a manager, told me in private he is disgusted that this black diamond will receive a golden handshake of over one million Rand just for one years service. One million Rand amounts to the total pension savings after a lifetime of work for many middle class white workers.

In the same firm, where I did contract work for a longer period, I had to work with a black college, very friendly, everything. When it came down to work, I continually had to assist him. To my surprise I found out he had the title ‘manager’. I thought this must be bragging. Then I saw him driving out with his car one afternoon – a luxury BMW. When my contract ended, I had to hand over part of my work to him. He sat on a chair opposite to me, asked some questions. While he was asking questions he started scratching his balls.

In the same company there was a colored project leader. He just gave orders and did the planning. When it came down to doing the work, it was me who did it. As time went on, I indirectly had to take the lead to get things done, since you could get no decisions out of him. So he had the title and I drew up all the project schedules – he just rubber stamped them.

*************

Posted by Grumbleguts on behalf of Citizen Kane.

THE HOLY GRAIL OF KAFFIR ENTITLEMUNT

March 10th, 2010

The much cherished 100% discount..!!!

Doodler, commenting on Irish Savant blog, said   

“I know several black professionals, but when one gets to know them well, you begin to understand the chasm between us. For a rapid understanding, get one drunk – their true colours become readily apparent”.      

Unlike probably many of you who have to suffer the predations of the faeces species daily in your lives and workplaces, my face-to-face encounters with these parasitical  creatures are happily rare, mostly car guards, building wekkas, the occasional over-promoted minor bureaucrat, and the like, or should I say, the dislike!   And although it is good and advisable to try to keep it that way, I do have one big regret. 

Purely for scientific purposes, and the furthering of my own “Bantu Education”, I would dearly love to meet some of these fabulous (but almost certainly fake) black diamonds we keep hearing about, and discover  what (stolen) mechanism makes them tick.   But I have little contact with any AA-infested wekker-place nor any BEE dis-industry. 

However this following story of a chance recent encounter confirms 100% what Doodler said above.     

 As a follow-up it would be great if other readers can send in their own stories of SBG encounters in the comments section, or if you prefer – email them to me – bantueducation at hushmail.com – I will collate them for a future headline posting.    

Sophisticated Black Gentleman

At a new CT wine bar we met a pleasant Dutch couple (30-ish) and a very well-groomed, smartly-dressed, very affable, black gentleman, a lawyer of some sort (at least in its own estimation), and a connoisseur of fine wines.  Eureka!   Maybe I had at last sighted that mythical African beast, a sophisticated black gentleman!        

On being invited to join their table the smooth-talking SBG displayed his sophistication by launching into a discussion of fine red (nevertheless whitey, if you get my drift) wines.  It soon became apparent that the woman, a tall busty blonde, had been er, making amends for apartheid by engaging in bestiality close inter-personal activities with the SBG.   With the help of SBG’s sophisticated chat, we were all getting along so well that the Dutchman suggested we go to a nearby favourite bistro of his.  Turned out the prices were somewhat more sophisticated than we were accustomed to but, never mind, our SBG had taken charge of the wine ordering department, and as the usual restaurant convention is that the person in charge of the wine is the one presented the bill, I thought all was fine.    

We were enjoying our new friends and I, especially, was more than a little fascinated with the SBG.  As he discoursed along in his amiable fashion, it crossed my mind that maybe our SBG was the ideal of the Holy Grail of liberal equalitarian fantasy.  Here maybe a genuine black diamond – a cultured and civilized being from the noble but downtrodden race that had been so grievously traumatized by (in the measured words of Noble Prize Bishoprick Tutu) “The Unspeakable Horrors of Apartheid”, damningly indicted by the Orgasm of Useless Nations as “a Crime against Humanity” (sic) and, with nary a hint of histrionic hyperbole, a “Holocaust comparable with THE Holocaust” (words to that effect), by the incontestable authority of the faultlessly virtuous and saintly Lord Madiba, blessings be upon thee.    

Unaware of my musings our SBG continued to display his leadership qualities, sophistication and, a hopefully fat wallet, by ordering 3 more expensive bottles of wine, on top of the 2 or 3 already consumed.   But inevitably whitey’s stuff did its devilish work on the SBG – the fragile mask of sophistication dropped like a stone and the pent-up rage against whitey’s achievMUNTS erupted in a torrent of infantile resentMUNT pouring like vomit from the suited monkey.     

Not wishing to assist the SBG in, what had by now become, his feverish quest for the “Holy Grail of Kaffir entitleMUNT” (the cherished 100% discount!!!), I somehow resisted the enormous temptation to chime in.    All to no avail, as the arrival of the sophisticated bill was the cue for our (not-so) SBG to go shake hands with his best friend.    Not having brought enough cash I paid the bill by card and the Dutchies gave me their cash.   When our now rather unsophisticated BG came tottering back, and I asked for his share, the wine fancier exclaimed “Eish Man, eh no marney..!”     

 

Long story short, Blondie paid the missing share a couple of days later – almost certainly her money not the SBG´s who, she informed us, “she´d dropped”.   Sadly, we never saw our Dutch friends again, I suspect because I attempted to give them an unwelcome crash course in Bantu Education (ie, educating whitey about the Bantu).  

Posted by Bantu Education as a public service 

   

Links to other Blogs

March 10th, 2010

About 3 weeks ago we had to restore our database. Oddly enough, once we had restored the data we noticed that some links to other blogs had been accidentally deleted.

We absolutely want to restore the links we have lost. Please let us know if you are aware of any blog links that should be up but are not.

Many thanks,

Gonville

Zimbabwe’s white farmers plan to seize government properties

March 9th, 2010

By Peta Thornycroft in Harare and Sebastien Berger In Johannesburg

White Zimbabwean farmers whose land was grabbed by Robert Mugabe plan to turn the tables by seizing at least 11 properties of Zimbabwean-owned property in South Africa. Lawyers for dispossessed farmers believe that on Monday they will be able to start using the law to seize houses in Cape Town which are owned by the Zimbabwean government. Their action, which follows a landmark legal ruling, promises to humiliate Mr Mugabe and embarrass South Africa’s president Jacob Zuma, who was on a state visit to Britain last week. The battle for justice fought by one of the white farmers, Mike Campbell, aged 77, was featured in the documentary film Mugabe and the White African. It was shown in British cinemas this year to great acclaim. The film tells how he fought stubbornly to bring a legal case in 2008 against Mr Mugabe’s government at the Southern African Development Community tribunal, based in the Namibian capital Windhoek.

Mr Campbell won a victory when the court ruled that Mr Mugabe’s farm takeovers were racist in nature and therefore illegal. At the North Gauteng High Court in the South African capital Pretoria last month, the farmers successfully applied for the Namibian judgement to be enforced in South Africa. Lawyers acting for the Mr Campbell and a group of other farmers believe after that ruling they can seize Zimbabwean government-owned property, to recover legal costs f! rom the South African case. Mr Campbell, who was severely beaten by land invaders in 2008, was too frail to comment yesterday. But his son-in-law Ben Freeth, 41, said: “This is not about revenge. This is about the long arm of the law. We hope to expand our actions further and investigate whether we can, in time, sue individuals who were responsible for what has been going on.” Late last year Mr Freeth watched helplessly as thugs burned down his farmhouse in Zimbabwe.

Their representatives have identified at least 11 properties which are owned by the government of Zimbabwe, including houses in Cape Town worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. Unlike properties in Pretoria which are connected to the embassy, the Cape Town properties are thought not to be protected by diplomatic immunity. The lawyers say it will be a groundbreaking development, as they are not aware of any precedent for government-owned properties being seized in pursuit of a civil judgement. The timing is awkward for Mr Zuma. This week the South African president called for Western sanctions to be lifted against Mr Mugabe and his cronies, during a state visit to Britain. The EU recently renewed sanctions for another year, although Western officials point out the sanctions hit only specific regime members rather than the Zimbabwean people as a whole.

The former opposition Movement for Democratic Change went into a coalition with Mr Mugabe’s Zanu PF party just over a year ago, but the agreement has been beset by difficulties. At one point the MDC boycotted cabinet meetings for several weeks, blaming obstructionism by Zanu PF. In the meantime seizures of white-owned farms have continued. The SADC tribunal has yet to set an amount to be paid in compensation, but the lawyers say they are already able to seek the seizures to recover costs in connection with the court hearing in South Africa, estimated at about £12,000. Willie Spies, the lead South African lawyer in the case, said it would be almost impossible for the Zimbabwean government to appeal against the seizures as it had not contested the North Gauteng court ruling.

The South African government was not a party to the proceedings, he added, and while technically it could apply for judicial review it would be in a “moral predicament” if it tried to do so, as in a separate case last year it had formally agreed to “honour and uphold” the SADC tribunal verdict. “It’s going to be a very interesting test for the independence of our sheriffs and for the South African government,” he said. The ruling has not been enforceable in Zimbabwe. Senior Zanu PF officials have sought to dismiss the significance of the legal proceedings. They have claimed that the SADC tribunal did not have jurisdiction over Zimbabwe, even though the nation is a member of the organisation and government lawyers appeared in court to defend it. At the time of the SADC tribunal ruling, the then minister of lands, Didymus Mutasa, said: “They are day-dreaming because we are not going to reverse the land reform exercise.” Patrick Chinamasa, Zimbabwe’s justice minister, could not be reached for comment on the latest developments.

Original Source: Sunday Telegraph (UK)